|Chris Merritt, MD, MPH||Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island. Rhode Island Hospital/Hasbro Children’s Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Providence, Rhode Island|
FOUNDATIONAL EDUCATIONAL KNOWLEDGE
The large majority of those who complete graduate programs or fellowships in medical education report that these programs had a strong influence on their educational skills and practices.2,10,11 Understanding a structured, evidence-based approach to curriculum development lends itself to an improved educational “product,” as well as increasing the likelihood that educational innovation is disseminated as scholarship.12 Most master’s programs use applied learning approaches, which require learners to develop true-life examples of teaching practice, curriculum development, and assessment and evaluation schemes. Learning and applying what is learned in this manner lends itself to more fully-realized skill and understanding.
There exist a number of core domains within the scope of HPE training programs, including theories of teaching and learning, teaching practice (including educational methods and curriculum development), assessment and evaluation, research methods and scholarship, and leadership and management.7 Within each of these core content areas lies the foundational knowledge and skills felt to be necessary for leaders in education scholarship and practice. The impact seems greater than simply providing the knowledge and technical skills, however. The literature identifies a number of additional potential benefits of advanced training in education beyond technical and theoretical expertise.
Medical faculty who seek formal training in HPE report that they are more prepared and more productive than their peers who follow more traditional routes, with improved professional educational activities and increased engagement in scholarly activities.10 Master’s degree graduates report even greater impact, including greater ability to institute curriculum reforms and improved assessment and feedback practices, but also greater engagement in scholarly activities and a higher rate of journal publication in education scholarship.10 These skills in research will both advance the field as well as assist with promotion within academia.
FROM LEARNING COMMUNITY TO COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE
Beginning in the learning communities fostered within HPE programs – via relationships with faculty, mentors, and other learners – learners begin to form larger and more interconnected personal learning networks. These can be bolstered through social media, professional societies, and other endeavors.13 As these learning networks become organized into formal communities of practice, they are often fruitful in developing ongoing professional partnerships within and beyond institutional boundaries.14 Sharing common language and interests, learned through didactic work and network-building, promotes a connection to the broader community of educators, both within and beyond emergency medicine.
Perhaps the most important factor in academic productivity and success, the chance to establish and develop a mentorship relationship is among the drivers of satisfaction among graduates of advanced programs in HPE. Mentorship and collaboration build capacity for educational scholarship and research.5,15 Serving as role models, coaches, and occasionally task-masters, mentors can model the type of lifelong learning necessary to maintain competence and retain passion. As each cohort of learners matures, the community of co-learners may also play a supportive peer-mentorship role; learners help one another set goals, review progress, and maintain enthusiasm for a variety of projects.11 Having experienced the vitality of a successful mentoring relationship, program graduates are well positioned to begin to provide mentorship to more junior learners. Anecdotal and empirical evidence suggests that although formal mentorship roles are established for the duration of a course of study, these relationships often continue well beyond graduation.16
Professional Identity Formation
Emergency physicians (and physicians and professionals of all stripes) undergo a constant evolution of identity. This evolution is punctuated by a series of milestones, from the ceremonial white coat ceremonies in medical schools to graduations marking professional advancement and formal boundaries of entrustment. But this evolution in professional identity does not end with the completion of training. Many clinician-educators move through a series of intermingled overlapping stages, identifying with various roles (physician, teacher, administrator, researcher, and leader) to greater or lesser degree depending on the influences and interactions of professional life.
A firm identity as an educator need not require formal education training, but it is clear that this professional identification is stimulated when surrounded by like-minded colleagues, performing roles increasingly central to the educator’s mission, and reinforced through shared experience, interests, and activities. As an educator’s expertise develops so does the identity as an educator. A formal training environment, emphasizing scholarship and innovation, reinforces the developing professional identities of participants, moving from something I do (“I teach”) to someone I am (“I am an educator”). Education leaders may be described as master adaptive learners, with focus on deep understanding of education theory, practice and improvement.17 Often described as a transformative experience, advanced HPE training can solidify this sense of purpose and commitment as an educator.11
DEVELOPMENT OF AREAS OF FOCUS IN ACADEMIA AND CAREER ADVANCEMENT
While still possible to hold a position as an academic medical educator without formal qualifications, it is no longer sufficient, as Hu et al. report, “to remain the ‘enthusiastic amateur.’”18 Clinical or administrative expertise, once common criteria for appointment to educational leadership roles, no longer support this type of academic advancement. Particularly within medical schools, where non-clinician educators often have greater expertise and longer records of education scholarship than do clinicians, the cachet that comes with formal training may pave the way for advancement of education leaders. In addition to laying the groundwork for a program of education scholarship, helping to build professional networks, and solidifying professional identity, formal training programs in HPE may provide the type of credential that a reputation as an enthusiastic teacher may not. Due to the advanced training and credentials associated with that training graduates may be called upon more often for consultation and expertise, in turn leading to greater responsibility. Though difficult to ascribe career advancement to formalized training alone, the exposure and recognition that result may certainly contribute to the likelihood of new opportunities.
Simply by joining the community of practice of emergency medicine educators, broadening one’s own personal learning network, and achieving expertise in the discipline of HPE, leadership opportunities will arise. Leadership skills – like many of the other skills that emergency physicians learn throughout our professional lives – can be observed, taught, and learned. Most advanced training programs in HPE contain a dedicated leadership component; leadership and management are included in the core content of most master’s degree programs in HPE.7 By focusing a significant portion of their curriculum on explicit understanding of leadership models, organizational structure, strategic management, and conflict resolution, these programs prepare graduates to be not just educators, but educational leaders. These leadership skills are broadly applicable, though inconsistently taught during clinical training. Leadership skills are valued by HPE training program participants and their employers, and have been reported to have significant impact on attitudes, knowledge, skills and behavior.19
Emergency physicians are well situated to move into leadership roles in education and education scholarship. As HPE has become increasingly professionalized, and the demands for rigor in education scholarship grow, emergency physicians are likely to continue to seek opportunities for formalized advanced training in education and education scholarship. As these advanced programs increase in number and scope, those clinicians who seek to further develop into leaders and clinician educators will likely increasingly be expected to attain such expertise.
Though the literature examining the impact of advanced programs in health professions education is in its infancy, early evidence suggests real value for their graduates. Graduates report gaining much more than technical teaching skills, though these are clearly crucial to building the foundation in education practice, leadership and scholarship. Participation in a program of advanced training helps shepherd the learner into the community of practice of medical educators, catalyzing connections in an ever-expanding network of collaborators and colleagues. Formal HPE programs can align learners with mentors whose guidance is crucial in developing skills and capacity as well as networking and career direction. Graduates of HPE programs report greater confidence and self-efficacy, as well as a more well-defined sense of professional identity. Formally-trained educators appreciate the effect that a “credential” has on career advancement, while recognizing that it takes more than a diploma to achieve success as a clinician educator; a well-developed personal learning network and community of practice are important for longevity.
Programs of faculty development in HPE are not without costs, both real financial costs and opportunity costs. Commitment to a longitudinal course of study in education may preclude learners from other opportunities, and protected time to fully engage in a learning program is a scarce commodity. Tuition for graduate degree programs may be costly, and if borne by the learner alone may or may not yield an acceptable return on investment. The decision to pursue HPE training, as well as which specific type of program to pursue (interleaved faculty development, post-graduate fellowship, certificate programs or degree-granting graduate program) is a choice best left to the learner. Factors including institutional support, protected time, location, mentorship, and other considerations are unique to each individual, and there is likely no universal “best fit.” Working professionals must be able to find a balance of time committed to their program and time committed to their other personal and professional lives. Master’s programs may require two to three years or longer to complete, and though criteria exist to ensure that programs adhere to the highest standards, this may be difficult to assess from the perspective of the prospective learner.20,21 These are real considerations when embarking on such a program of study.
Though emergency physicians pride themselves on being able to do or teach nearly anything at any time, the pressures in academic practice often push faculty toward increasing specialization. From enhancing technical teaching skills to preparing working professionals to pursue careers as clinician educators, education leaders, and education scholars, advanced degree programs in health professions education may be appealing to emergency physicians who see themselves as embodying the full role of clinician-educators. More than being engaging teachers, leaders in education must understand the processes of curriculum design, must be able to teach skills in lifelong learning, must understand programs of assessment and evaluation, and must be able to transform this work into scholarship. Education leaders have the responsibility to do these things. With mastery of these skills, the clinician educator is now able to take a seat in the cockpit to safely guide the airline, aircraft, and passengers.
Section Editor: Jeffrey N. Love, MD
Full text available through open access at http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem
Address for Correspondence: Chris Merritt, MD, MPH, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital/Hasbro Children’s Hospital, 593 Eddy St., HCH 137, Providence, RI 02903. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org. 1 / 2018; 19:7 – 10
Submission history: Revision received October 27, 2017; Accepted October 27, 2017
Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.
1. Gruppen LD, Frohna AZ, Anderson RM, et al. Faculty development for educational leadership and scholarship. Acad Med. 2003;78(2):137-41.
2. Love JN, Yarris LM, Santen SA, et al. A novel specialty-specific, collaborative faculty development opportunity in education research: program evaluation at five years. Acad Med. 2016;91:548-5.
3. Brown Alpert Medical School Program in Educational Faculty Development. Available at: https://www.brown.edu/academics/medical/education/educational-faculty-development. Accessed October 20, 2016.
4. Varpio L, Gruppen L, Hu W, et al. Working Definitions of the roles and an organizational structure in health professions education scholarship: initiating an international conversation. Acad Med. 2017;92(2):205-8.
5. Ahmed R, Farooq A, Storie D, et al. Building capacity for education research among clinical educators in the health professions: A BEME (Best Evidence Medical Education) Systematic Review of the outcomes of interventions: BEME Guide No. 34. Med Teach. 2016;38(2):123-36.
6. Tekian A, Harris I. Preparing health professions education leaders worldwide: A description of masters-level programs. Med Teach. 2012;34(1):52-8.
7. Tekian A, Artino AR. AM last page: master’s degree in health professions education programs. Acad Med. 2013;88(9):1399.
8. FAIMER – Masters Programs in Health Professions Education. Available at: http://www.faimer.org/resources/mastersmeded.html. Accessed May 25, 2017.
9. Gruppen LD, Burkhardt JC, Fitzgerald JT, et al. Competency-based education: programme design and challenges to implementation. Med Educ. 2016;50(5):532-9.
10. Sethi A, Schofield S, Ajjawi R, et al. How do postgraduate qualifications in medical education impact on health professionals?. Med Teach. 2016;38(2):162-7.
11. Lown BA, Newman LR, Hatem CJ. The personal and professional impact of a fellowship in medical education. Acad Med. 2009;84(8):1089-97.
12. Merritt C, Gaines S, Smith J, et al. A novel curriculum to optimize emergency medicine residents’ exposure to pediatrics. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(1):14-9.
13. Dabbagh N, Kitsantas A. Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet High Educ. 2012;15(1):3-8.
14. Sherbino J, Snell L, Dath D, et al. A national clinician-educator program: a model of an effective community of practice. Med Educ Online. 2010;15.
15. Blanchard RD, Visintainer PF, La Rochelle J. Cultivating medical education research mentorship as a pathway towards high quality medical education research. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(9):1359-62.
16. Farrell SE, Digioia NM, Broderick KB, et al. Mentoring for clinician-educators. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(12):1346-50.
17. Schumacher DJ, Englander R, Carraccio C. Developing the master learner. Acad Med. 2013;88(11):1635-45.
18. Hu WCY, Thistlethwaite JE, Weller J, et al. “It was serendipity”: a qualitative study of academic careers in medical education. Med Educ. 2015;49(11):1124-36.
19. Steinert Y, Naismith L, Mann K. Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19. Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503.
20. Tekian AS, Taylor DCM. Master’s degrees: meeting the standards for medical and health professions education. Med Teach. 2017;39(9):906-13.
21. Pugsley L, Brigley S, Allery L, Macdonald J. Counting quality because quality counts: differing standards in master’s in medical education programmes. Med Teach. 2008;30(1):80-5.