|Holly Gil, MD||Brown University, Department of Radiology, Providence, Rhode Island|
|Ryan M. Finn, MD||Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota|
|Neha P. Raukar, MD, MS||Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota|
A 48-year-old male who presented with signs and symptoms suggestive of an upper respiratory infection was seen at an urgent care, he had a negative chest radiograph and was discharged. With no other cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the state, the patient presented to the emergency department two days later with worsening shortness of breath.
There are a variety of findings on both chest radiograph and computed tomography of the chest that suggests COVID-19.
A 48-year-old man with a history of asthma and reflux presented to the emergency department (ED) with a dry cough, sore throat, pleuritic chest pain, and dyspnea on exertion a week after serving as a tour guide in Europe and sharing equipment with other tour guides. He had been seen at an urgent care two days prior where he had a normal chest radiograph (CXR) and was discharged. On arrival to the ED, he was hemodynamically stable but had an oxygen saturation of 87% on room air, was tachypneic, using accessory muscles, and was febrile to 103.2° Fahrenheit. He was intubated secondary to respiratory distress. CXR and computed tomography (CT) were done in the ED, and it was later confirmed he was infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2),1 which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).2
The primary finding on CXR is airspace opacities that are often bilateral or peripheral and found typically in the lower zones (Image 1).3,4
While there are over a dozen non-specific findings suggestive of COVID-19 on CT, those with the highest discriminatory values were ground-glass opacities (GGO), and GGO that are bilateral and/or peripheral in distribution (Image 2).5
Given the infectious nature of SARS-CoV-2, a portable, single-view CXR is preferred to limit contamination.6 Of those hospitalized, CXR is abnormal 69% of the time and findings are most prominent 10–12 days after symptom onset.4
Within the first two days of symptom onset, CT is normal 56% of the time, and after day three of symptoms is abnormal in at least 90% of patients.7 Despite the non-specific nature of these findings, radiologists are able to distinguish between COVID-19 and viral pneumonia with high specificity and moderate sensitivity.5 Although not diagnostic, imaging can suggest the presence of COVID-19 disease, and the American College of Radiology has adopted standardized language to reduce reporting variability.8
What do we already know about this clinical entity?
The high infectious state, especially when asymptomatic, and increased mortality seen with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has led to a global pandemic.
What is the major impact of the image(s)?
Bilateral and/or peripheral airspace opacities on radiographs and computed tomography can help suggest infection before testing results are available.
How might this improve emergency medicine practice?
Early identification of potentially positive cases can help the healthcare team maintain vigilance in protecting themselves and when indicated and available, start treatment early.
Section Editor: Rick A. McPheeters, DO
Full text available through open access at http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_cpcem
The authors attest that their institution requires neither institutional review board approval nor patient consent for publication of this image in emergency medicine. Documentation on file.
Address for Correspondence: Neha Raukar, MD, MS, Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, 200 First Street, Rochester, MN 55905. Email: email@example.com. 4:464 – 465
Submission history: Revision received April 11, 2020; Submitted April 28, 2020; Accepted April 28, 2020
Conflicts of Interest: By the CPC-EM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. The authors disclosed none.
1. Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: the species and its viruses – a statement of the Coronavirus Study Group. 2020. Available at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.07.937862v1. Accessed February 26, 2020.
2. Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the virus that causes it. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it. Accessed April 1, 2020.
3. Rodrigues JCL, Hare SS, Edey A, et al. An update on COVID-19 for the radiologist: A British Society of Thoracic Imaging statement. Clin Radiol. 2020;75(5):323-5.
4. Wong HYF, Lam HYS, Fong AH, et al. [Ahead of Print]. Frequency and distribution of chest radiographic findings in COVID-19 positive patients. Radiology. 2019.
5. Bai HX, Hsieh B, Xiong Z, et al. [Ahead of Print]. Performance of radiologists in differentiating COVID-19 from viral pneumonia on chest CT. Radiology. 2020.
6. ACR recommendations for the use of chest radiography and computer tomography (CT) for suspected COVID-19 infection. 2020. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/COVID-19-Radiology-Resources. Accessed April 2, 2020.
7. Bernheim A, Mei X, Huang M, et al. [Ahead of Print]. Chest CT findings in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): relationship to duration of infection. Radiology. 2020.
8. Simpson S, Kay FU, Abbara S, et al. [Ahead of Print]. Special Report: Radiological Society of North America Expert Consensus Statement on Reporting Chest CT Findings Related to COVID-19. Endorsed by the Society of Thoracic Radiology, the American College of Radiology, and RSNA. J Thorac Imaging. 2020.