ABSTRACT

A 19-year-old female with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) presented with ischemia of her left hand following trauma. Medical therapy was initiated but failed to improve her symptoms, and revision amputation was ultimately performed. The patient’s final diagnosis was digital ischemia due to secondary Raynaud’s Phenomenon (RP). The authors discuss diagnosis, complications, and treatment of this relatively uncommon disorder. The authors report this case in order to discuss how secondary RP can be complicated by ischemia and the multidisciplinary approach that needs to take place to prevent the latter from occurring.

A 19-year-old female was admitted to the hospital because she had ongoing ischemia to her left index and small fingers. Forty hours before admission, the trauma to her fingertips when she caught her hand in a car door. Thirty-five hours before this presentation, the patient was seen in another emergency room and was noted to have a bluish discoloration to her fingertips with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus. She was diagnosed with RP and given amlodipine and aspirin. A few hours later, without relief of her symptoms and worsening pain, the patient was transferred for higher level of care to a second emergency department.

Upon arrival, the patient was afebrile with stable vital signs, including a temperature of 98°F, blood pressure of 125/92 mmHg, pulse of 113, respiratory rate of 18, O2 saturation of 97% in room air. She was very emotional and anxious and expressed a pain level of 10 out of 10. Her left hand showed a purplish-blue discoloration and edema to the fourth and fifth digits, accompanied by bullae on the ulnar surface of her small finger (Figure 1). She was tender to palpation along the flexor sheath, but both flexor digitorum profundus and superficialis were intact. Pulse oximetry to the affected digits was zero, and she had decreased perception to light touch.

The patient was given benzodiazepines and pain medication. Orthopaedics was quickly involved on the case and an angiogram ordered. Rheumatology upon consultation added solumedrol, and the patient was started on an epoprostenol drip.

Left upper extremity angiogram findings included a patent left axillary, brachial, ulnar, radial, deep and superficial palmar arches, common and proper digital arteries 1–3. There was complete occlusion of proper digital arteries for the fourth and fifth digits. There was no response to intra-arterial vasodilator and the patient was deemed an unlikely candidate for lytic therapy secondary to the distal nature of the occlusion.

After five days of epoprostenol drip with minimal improvement in her symptoms, the patient was scheduled for revision amputation. Final pathology diagnosis was necrosis, mixed inflammation consistent with gangrene due to secondary RP.

DISCUSSION

Secondary RP is less common than primary RP and occurs in association with an underlying disease, typically connective tissue, neurovascular, hematological, or drug-induced disorder.³ While primary Raynaud phenomenon (RP) rarely leads to complications, secondary RP, when associated with a mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), can quickly progress to catastrophic ischemic events resulting in the loss of fingers, toes, and even limbs.⁴ Timely therapeutic intervention is therefore required. Primary and secondary RP appear to be in a continuum. In one study, as many as 20% of participants followed prospectively were later diagnosed with a MCTD.⁵ Determining the root cause of a Raynaud crisis can be difficult, and emergent treatment may be challenging due to lack of clearly effective therapy. Therapeutic measures have included a range from avoiding triggers to vasodilator drugs or anti-platelet aggregation drugs to spinal cord stimulation and surgery. Treatment should be individualized for every patient depending on disease severity.

Conservative treatment for RP includes warming and stress reduction,² however, we found no satisfactory RCTs on the effects of warming. Six small RCTs found that nifedipine reduced the frequency and severity of attacks over 4–12 weeks compared with placebo, and was rated by participants as more effective than placebo in improving overall symptoms. The participants experienced an average of 2.8 to 5.0 fewer attacks per week and a 33% reduction in severity. It was found that nifedipine was associated with higher rates of adverse effects compared with placebo, causing several participants to drop out of every study. Adverse effects include flushing, headache, edema, and tachycardia.⁶

The use of aspirin and dipyridamole in patients with secondary RP has been studied in at least two controlled trails. Neither demonstrated any significant effect.^7,8 Grader-Beck and Wigley recommend that patients with MCTD be placed on anti-platelet therapy with 81 mg of aspirin daily, unless there is a contraindication. They also recommend the use of heparin for 24 to 72 hours for patients who have rapidly advancing ischemic disease, but do not recommend chronic anticoagulation, despite the fact that this has not been studied.² A recent study demonstrated the benefit of low molecular weight heparin for symptomatic improvement in primary and secondary RP.⁹

When ischemia progresses rapidly and fails to respond to standard vasodilatory therapy, intravenous iloprost, alprostadil, or epoprostenol may be given.² Similar results in a meta-analysis were obtained for intravenous infusions of iloprost in patients with secondary RP associated with systemic sclerosis. In addition, intravenous infusions of iloprost improved healing of fingertip ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Small single randomized controlled trials include angiotensin II-receptor type 1 antagonists (losartan), the calcium channel blockers felodipine and amlodipine, serotonin-reuptake-inhibitors (fluoxetine) and phosphodiesterase-V-inhibitors (sildenafil, vardenafil). However, the results promising substances have to be confirmed in long-term trials with larger patient numbers.^10,11,12,13

When medical therapy fails, several surgical interventions can be considered. These include proximal or distal (digital) sympathectomy and arterial reconstruction. Distal sympathectomy is associated with a lower complication rate than proximal sympathectomy, but the long-term outcome has not been well-documented.^14,15 As with other vasodilator therapy, sympathectomy is less effective in patients who have secondary RP.^2,16 Amputation of digits appears to occur infrequently and is usually reported as individual cases.^17,18

If there is evidence of larger vessel occlusive disease, such as has been reported at the level of the ulnar or radial arteries, vascular reconstruction can be performed successfully with vein grafts.⁴ Therefore, all patients who present with a critical ischemic crisis should have a careful assessment to detect any correctable macrovascular disease. To further define the magnitude of larger vessel disease in these cases, arterial doppler studies, magnetic resonance angiography, or angiography can be used.²

When associated with MCTD, RP requires aggressive diagnostics and initial therapy to decrease arterial vasospasm. Management of this disease requires a multidisciplinary effort in the coordination of a sound treatment plan for without this focus, even minor trauma may result in digital amputation.