Trends of Regional Anesthesia Studies in Emergency Medicine: An Observational Study of Published Articles

Author Affiliation
Tou-Yuan Tsai, MD Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chiayi, Taiwan;
Tzu Chi University, School of Medicine, Hualien, Taiwan
Hsin-Tzu Yeh, MD Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Department of Emergency Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Yu-Chang Liu, MD Chi Mei Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Tainan, Taiwan
Ching-Hsing Lee, MD Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Keelung, Taiwan
Kuan-Fu Chen, MD, PhD Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Keelung, Taiwan
Eric H. Chou, MD Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas;
Baylor University Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dallas, Texas
Jen-Tang Sun, MD, MSc Tzu Chi University, School of Medicine, Hualien, Taiwan;
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Taipei City, Taiwan
Kuo-Chih Chen, MD Taipei Medical University, Shuang Ho Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Taipei City, Taiwan
Yi-Kung Lee, MD, MPH Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chiayi, Taiwan;
Tzu Chi University, School of Medicine, Hualien, Taiwan
Su Weng Chau, MD Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chiayi, Taiwan;
Tzu Chi University, School of Medicine, Hualien, Taiwan




Regional anesthesia (RA) has become a prominent component of multimodal pain management in emergency medicine (EM), and its use has increased rapidly in recent decades. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of data on how RA practice has evolved in the specialty. In this study we sought to investigate how RA has been implemented in EM by analyzing trends of published articles and to describe the characteristics of the published research.


We retrieved RA-related publications from the SciVerse Scopus database from inception to January 13, 2022, focusing on studies associated with the use of RA in EM. The primary outcome was an analysis of trend based on the number of annual publications. Other outcomes included reports of technique diversity by year, trends in the use of individual techniques, and characteristics of published articles. We used linear regression analysis to analyze trends.


In total, 133 eligible publications were included. We found that overall 23 techniques have been described and results published in the EM literature. Articles related to RA increased from one article in 1982 to 18 in 2021, and the rate of publication has increased more rapidly since 2016. Reports of lower extremity blocks (60.90%) were published most frequently in ranked-first aggregated citations. The use of thoracic nerve blocks, such as the erector spinae plane block, has increased exponentially in the past three years. The United States (41.35%) has published the most RA-related articles. Regional anesthesia administered by emergency physicians (52.63%) comprised the leading field in published articles related to RA. Most publications discussed single-shot (88.72%) and ultrasound-guided methods (55.64%).


This study highlights that the number of published articles related to regional anesthesia in EM has increased. Although RA research has primarily focused on lower extremity blocks, clinical researchers continue to broaden the field of study to encompass a wide spectrum of techniques and indications.


The history of regional anesthesia (RA) began with the discovery of the local anesthetic properties of cocaine in 1884.1 The first formal pain management organization, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, was founded in 1923 in honor of Gaston Laba, who is considered the “father” of RA and pain medicine.2 Research on RA was first published in the emergency medicine (EM) literature in the 1980s with articles describing the use of femoral nerve block to treat femoral fractures.3,4 Numerous studies have demonstrated that nerve blocks can lower pain scores more than systemic analgesia.5,6 Using RA can also reduce the incidence of delirium, length of hospital stay, and mortality rate, even when administered in the emergency department (ED) or prehospital setting.7,8 In EM, indications for RA are diverse, including shoulder reduction, acute pain management in traumatic fracture, headache, herpes zoster, acute pancreatitis, and paraphimosis reduction.9-13

Despite indications that RA is becoming a universally adopted technique, there is a paucity of data on how RA practice has evolved in EM. Therefore, our primary aim in this study was to investigate the published research trends associated with RA in EM from inception to 2021. Our secondary aim was to describe the characteristics of the published research studies and their content.


Study Design and Setting

This was a retrospective observational study in which we looked at all the publication and citation data retrieved from the SciVerse Scopus database.14 The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Taiwan (No. 202200609B1).

Article Selection and Assessment

Regional anesthesia is defined as a specific anesthetic technique that inhibits nerve transmission to avoid or relieve pain, including spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, and nerve blocks.15 Emergency medicine encompasses initial evaluation and treatment of any patient requiring expeditious medical and surgical care in a hospital-based or freestanding emergency department (ED), urgent care clinic, or prehospital setting such as an emergency medical response vehicle or a disaster site.16 Using the SciVerse Scopus database, we retrieved all publications about RA in EM published up to January 13, 2022. We searched the literature using the following keywords: “regional anesthesia,” “nerve block,” “preoperative,” and “emergency.” We searched for the keywords and linked the search terms with logical Boolean operators in the fields of the title, abstract, and keywords with the type of article.17 We excluded studies related to cesarean section, irreversible pulpitis, arthroplasty, arthroscopy, endarterectomy, or herniorrhaphy because of differences in settings, targets, and procedures.

Two reviewers (TYT and HTY) independently screened the titles and abstracts of articles that met the inclusion criteria in the search strategy. Full texts of potentially eligible studies were retrieved and further assessed for eligibility by different reviewers. Inter-reviewer disagreements were resolved by consensus, and a third reviewer (SWC) was consulted, if necessary. Two reviewers independently extracted the following data from the included articles: name of the first author; year of publication; number of citations; country of origin; article categories; publishing journal name; technique described; type of article; site where RA was administered; specialty of the clinician; participants; method of RA guidance; and RA regimens. The country of origin was determined based on the home institution or country of the first author. We further categorized the articles by type, such as case reports, research articles, and reviews, as specified by PubMed. Based on consensus, we categorized the techniques for nerve block into seven fields: upper extremity blocks; lower extremity blocks; thoracic nerve blocks; abdominal nerve blocks; head and neck blocks; cervical plexus blocks; and pudendal and paracervical blocks.18,19


The primary outcomes were the numbers of research articles published annually and the types of RA techniques described, which we used to evaluate the relationship between the number of papers/techniques and the trend of publication from inception to 2021. We also evaluated papers that we classified according to RA technique categories, which indicate the evolution of the RA research focus in EM. Other measures included the geographic distribution of papers by country, proportion of papers that were published in dedicated EM journals, and distribution of the publication year, type of article, setting, specialty of the RA clinicians, participants, methods of RA guidance, and anesthetic regimens.

Data Analysis

Because this study encompasses the entirety of available EM citations, rather than a representative sample, we report only descriptive statistics for the distribution of the numbers of article and citations. To analyze trends in the numbers of studies published, we used linear regression analysis. We used the slope (β) of the linear regression curve to represent the trend, and we calculated the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of β. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. We conducted all analyses using STATA, version 17.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).


Search Results and Regional Anesthesia-related Publication Trends

The initial SciVerse Scopus database search yielded 1,602 articles. We excluded 1,411 papers after screening the titles and abstracts for irrelevant topics, unavailable data, and duplicate records. Another 58 potentially relevant studies were excluded after a full-text review because the word “emergency” appeared in the abstract but RA was not administered in the ED or prehospital setting. After a careful review process, 133 published articles met all eligibility criteria (Supplementary Table S1): 72 (54.14%) articles were categorized as research articles; 50 (37.59%) as case reports; and 11 (8.27%) as reviews. Overall, the total, average, and median numbers of citations were 2,197, 19.44, and 10, respectively.

The number of RA-related articles in EM increased from one in 1982 to 18 in 2021. The number of articles has been increasing steadily since 1990 and has grown more rapidly since 2016 (Figure 1), with an increasing rate of papers published of 2.17 per year (P-value = 0.005, 95% CI 1.08–3.26). The trend in the publication of RA technique types was similar, with an increasing rate of 2.37 per year since 2016 (P-value = 0.01, 95% CI 0.85–3.90).


Figure 1
Annual numbers of published articles about techniques for performing regional anesthesia in the emergency department.

Characteristics of the Regional Anesthesia-related Papers

The 133 retrieved papers originated from 21 countries, and most studies were from the United States (55/133, 41.35%) (Table 1). Articles were published in 61 journals, with the majority published in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine (31/133, 23.31%), followed by the Journal of Emergency Medicine (16/133, 12.03%) (Supplementary Table S2). Overall, 118 (88.72%) articles reported that RA was performed in an ED and 13 (9.77%) in the prehospital setting (Table 2). Two included articles surveyed the efficacy of preoperative nerve blocks in acute traumatic hip fracture treatment with outcomes associated with the ED. However, these two studies did not mention the locations where the nerve blocks were performed. We categorized the two studies as “unavailable data” on setting.20,21 Regional anesthesia was primarily administered by emergency physicians (52.63%) in adult patients (77.44%), and with an ultrasound-guided method (55.64%). Most publications reported use of a single-shot technique (88.72%). Bupivacaine (36.84%) and lidocaine (29.32%) were the local anesthetics most commonly used for injections (Supplementary Table S3).

Table 1Country distribution in regional anesthesia-related publications by the number of publications.

Country Number of publications % Overall times cited
United States 55 41.35 1,072
France 12 9.02 173
United Kingdom 11 8.27 318
Turkey 11 8.27 88
Australia 7 5.26 71
India 6 4.51 41
Iran 6 4.51 19
Netherlands 4 3.01 75
Japan 3 2.26 38
Canada 3 2.26 25
Switzerland 3 2.26 7
Italy 2 1.50 32
Germany 2 1.50 19
Denmark 1 0.75 185
Belgium 1 0.75 17
Hong Kong 1 0.75 11
Tunisia 1 0.75 3
China 1 0.75 1
South Africa 1 0.75 1
Spain 1 0.75 1
Sweden 1 0.75 0

Table 2Characteristics of regional anesthesia-related articles.

Number of publications* %
 ED 118 88.72
 Prehospital 13 9.77
 NA 2 1.50
 Adults 103 77.44
 Pediatrics 12 9.02
 Both 7 5.26
 NA 11 8.27
 Single 118 88.72
 Continuous 3 2.26
 Both 1 0.75
 NA 11 8.27
Guidance method
 Ultrasound 74 55.64
 Landmark 47 35.34
 Nerve stimulator 11 8.27
 NA 12 9.02
Clinician or other personnel
 Emergency physician 70 52.63
 Anesthesiologist 16 12.03
 Orthopedist 4 3.01
 Paramedic 4 3.01
 Radiologist 1 0.75
 Neurologist 1 0.75
 Pediatrician 1 0.75
 ED nurse 1 0.75
 Specialist acute pain nurse 1 0.75
 NA 44 33.08

*Some articles mentioned more than one characteristic.
ED, emergency department; NA, not available.

Trends in Individualized Regional Anesthesia Techniques

In total, 23 RA techniques in the seven nerve block categories were described in the retrieved articles (Table 3). The technique most frequently reported in the published EM literature was a femoral nerve block (34/133, 25.56%), which was also the first RA technique reported in EM in 1982. Fascia iliaca compartment block (32/133, 24.06%) ranked second. Of note, the erector spinae plane block (13/133, 9.77%) was the third most published RA technique. The cumulative number of articles annually, sorted according to the seven nerve block categories, showed an upward trend (Figure 2). Lower extremity blocks were the leading research field prior to 2005. Interestingly, after 2016 research on upper extremity blocks, thoracic nerve blocks, and head and neck blocks increased exponentially.

Table 3Distribution of individual nerve block techniques reported in regional anesthesia-related articles.

Technique Number of articles* % Overall times cited
Lower extremity block
 Femoral nerve block 34 25.56 580
 Fascia iliaca compartment block 32 24.06 837
 Sciatic nerve block (transgluteal and popliteal) 11 8.27 67
 Superior cluneal nerve block 1 0.75 7
 Genicular nerve block 1 0.75 0
 Posterior tibial nerve block 2 1.50 7
 Total 81 60.90 1,498
Upper extremity block
 Interscalene block 8 6.02 158
 Supraclavicular block 6 4.51 99
 Infraclavicular block 4 3.01 14
 Axillary block 9 6.77 93
 Wrist block (radial, ulnar, or median nerve) 13 9.77 168
 Suprascapular nerve block 3 2.26 39
 Total 43 32.33 571
Thoracic nerve block
 Erector spinae plane block 13 9.77 115
 Serratus anterior plane block 6 4.51 53
 Intercostal nerve block 1 0.75 20
 Interpleural block 1 0.75 23
 Total 21 15.79 211
Abdominal nerve block
 Transversus abdominis plane block 1 0.75 1
 Total 1 0.75 1
Head and neck block
 Greater occipital nerve block 7 5.26 75
 Superficial cervical plexus block 2 1.50 45
 Others (orbital, mental, and auricular nerves) 6 4.51 18
 Total 15 11.27 138
Pudendal and paracervical block
 Dorsal penile nerve block 3 2.26 13
 Total 3 2.26 13
 Stellate ganglion block 2 1.50 3
 Spinal accessory nerve block 1 0.75 0

*Some articles mentioned more than one technique.


Figure 2
Timeline of published research on regional anesthesia since first being described in 1982. The graph shows an increasing trend in the use of lower extremity blocks, upper extremity blocks, thoracic nerve blocks, and head and neck blocks by emergency physicians.


Our study provides a statistical viewpoint of the evolution of publication trends in the use of RA in EM. In this study, we analyzed the publishing trends of RA-related articles using the number of overall papers, technique type, and numbers of citations. The trend in the number of articles and technique types has been increasing since the 1980s and has exponentially increased in the past five years. Most RA-related papers were published in the US. Emergency physician-administered, ultrasound-guided method, single-shot, lower extremity blocks comprised the leading fields in RA-related research. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the trends in RA-related EM research and analyze their characteristics.

In recent years, the opioid epidemic has emerged as one of the most critical challenges in EM.22 As one part of a multimodal analgesic regimen, RA provides a site-specific afferent neural block, achieving timely pain control with fewer complications compared with the administration of opioids. Regional anesthesia is based on the hypothesis that local injection of anesthetic drugs inhibits the propagation of impulses in nerve terminals to inhibit the perception of pain by the cerebral cortex. Evidence has demonstrated that RA could be useful as a tool to decrease the use of opioids for pain in the ED.23 Table 3 and Figure 2 show the diverse RA techniques used in EM and the 18 different techniques that were described in published research in 2021.

Regional anesthesia is currently the easiest, fastest, safest, and overall most effective and economical pain-blocking technique, making it the preferred method for emergency cases and patients with many comorbidities or with contraindications to the use of nonsteroidal inflammatory drugs or opioids. It has been used in EM since Berry pioneered its use as a femoral nerve block in femoral fractures in 1977.4,24 Because a fascia iliaca compartment block provides a more consistent simultaneous blockade of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerves and does not require a nerve stimulator, it has also been widely used for femoral fractures since 2003.25 The femoral nerve block and fascia iliaca compartment block were reported in the top three cited papers and most frequently in the top 10 cited papers (Supplementary Table S1).25-27 Articles about those blocks also steadily increased yearly (Figure 2).

A novel regional technique, the pericapsular nerve group block, has been shown to provide better pain reduction for hip fracture than femoral nerve block.28 However, only one case series in EM has been published to date.29 Regional anesthesia could also have potential application in shoulder reduction. In fact, one study reported that, unlike procedural sedation, RA shortened the length of ED stay, provided sufficient pain control, and contributed to patient satisfaction in shoulder reduction.30 Because of these strengths, articles associated with different RA techniques for shoulder reduction increased in the last decade. Interestingly, articles about the erector spinae plane block were cited often in recent years. A study by Luftig et al demonstrated that the erector spinae plane block is effective for pain control in patients with posterior rib fractures. Their article was published in 2018 and has been cited 50 times to date.31 In addition, the erector spinae plane block was reported applicable for pain control in herpes zoster, and a study by Tekin et al has been cited 18 times since its publication in 2019.11

While nerve stimulators were used in the past for guidance, more recent evidence has demonstrated that RA performed based on landmarks can be effective and more feasible in a typically busy ED.26 A review article revealed that 46% of emergency physicians in the United Kingdom use the landmark-guided femoral nerve block for femoral fractures.32 Currently, evidence shows that ultrasound-guided RA provides an increased success rate, shorter procedure time, and fewer complications compared with peripheral nerve stimulation and landmark-guided RA.33,34 Ultrasound-guided RA is becoming a universally adopted tool.35 This trend is comparable with our results. Our study demonstrated that more than half of RA-related articles reported the use of ultrasound-guided methods (55.64%), primarily after 2007 (Table 2).

In our study, nearly 90% of publications reported use of the single-shot block in EM. Compared with the single-shot block, a continuous nerve blockade takes more time and requires more resources in terms of staff, equipment, and capacity. It is not feasible in crowded and busy EDs.33 Lidocaine and bupivacaine are the two drugs used in the ED for RA.3,4,24 Both drugs were reported in about one third of publications (Supplementary Table S3). The desired characteristics depend on the patient’s circumstances. A long-acting drug, such as bupivacaine, is desirable for prolonged postoperative analgesia, but it would be particularly problematic in orthopedic assessment after surgery. A short-acting drug, such as lidocaine, is effective for pain control during a radiology examination and transport to the ED, but a bolus is needed after its effects fade.

In the past, many physicians (except anesthesiologists) regarded RA as too complex and intimidating.36 One potential barrier is the belief that RA is a technique performed only by anesthesiologists. Another barrier may be the longer time to perform RA than conventional pain management.37 However, the implementation of educational and awareness strategies of RA among clinical staff in the ED resulted in a significant increase in the administration of nerve blocks.38 Not only emergency physicians, but junior doctors, emergency medical services nurses, and paramedics can improve their competence in basic nerve block procedures with training curricula.25,39-41 Evidence indicates that such staff could safely administer RA with a high success rate and no complications.

A qualitative study surveyed patients about their experience with receiving landmark-based fascia iliaca compartment block performed by paramedics at the scene where the patients suffered their injury.42 Interestingly, patients recalled the high quality of care given by paramedics, experienced relief when a fascia iliaca compartment block was given, and had little or no memory of being offered, consenting to, or receiving the block a few weeks after the block was performed. In addition, RA could be performed in other settings, such as disaster sites.43 Because of its convenience and effectiveness, we hope that RA can be administrated by more diverse healthcare staff and applied in diverse situations.


The main strength of this observational study is its complete review of current RA-related publications in EM. However, it also has some limitations. First, the impact of studies from 2022 was underestimated, as no studies published in 2022 were included. This was a result of the gap between the paper’s publication and the appearance of citations in other journals. More recently published studies in 2021 have not had time to accumulate citations. The same phenomenon is mentioned in a previous similar study.44 Second, in our study, the published country was sorted according to the affiliation of the first author. Collaborative research between other countries would have been missed because of this methodology. This limitation caused underestimation of collaborative researchers’ contributions.

Third, it is possible that our data could be biased because of the misclassification of the sites where RA was administered and of the specialties of the physicians who performed the procedure. Although our intent was to categorize those variables precisely, the different systems between countries resulted in different definitions of healthcare sites and specialist types. Lastly, there is a potential risk of publication bias. Highly cited topics were based on acceptance of a manuscript with significant results. However, the impact of some topics may be underestimated because of the rare citation or rejection of a manuscript without positive, significant, or interesting results.


This study highlights that the number of articles documenting the use of regional anesthesia in the ED continues to increase. Compared with other techniques, lower extremity block reports were most frequently published in ranked-first aggregated citations.


Population Health Research Capsule

What do we already know about this issue?

Regional anesthesia (RA) has become a prominent component of pain management in the emergency department because it can be a more effective pain reliever than systemic analgesia.

What was the research question?

Our goal was to investigate trends in published research associated with RA in emergency medicine (EM) and to describe its characteristics.

What was the major finding of the study?

Among 23 techniques in the EM literature, the most common were studies of lower extremity blocks (61% of papers), reported from the US, and described single injections (89%) with ultrasound guidance (56%).

How does this improve population health?

Although RA research has primarily focused on lower extremity blocks, clinical researchers continue to broaden the field of study to encompass a wide spectrum of techniques and indications.



Section Editor: Kenneth S. Whitlow, DO

Full text available through open access at

Address for Correspondence: Su Weng Chau, Tzu Chi University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan, No.2, Minsheng Rd., Dalin Township, Chiayi County 622, Taiwan (R.O.C.). Email: 11 / 2022; 23:878 – 885

Submission history: Revision received May 29, 2022; Submitted August 26, 2022; Accepted August 27, 2022

Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.


1. Brown TC. History of pediatric regional anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(1):3-9.

2. Angaramo G, Savage J, Arcella D, et al. Comprehensive Curriculum of the History of Regional Anesthesia. 2019.

3. McGlone R, Sadhra K, Hamer DW, et al. Femoral nerve block in the initial management of femoral shaft fractures. Arch Emerg Med. 1987;4(3):163-8.

4. Tondare AS, Nadkarni AV. Femoral nerve block for fractured shaft of femur. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1982;29:270-1.

5. Guay J, Kopp S. Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020.

6. Tsai TY, Cheong KM, Su YC, et al. Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block in geriatric patients with hip fracture in the emergency department. J Clin Med. 2022;11(10):2778.

7. Scurrah A, Shiner CT, Stevens JA, et al. Regional nerve blockade for early analgesic management of elderly patients with hip fracture: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(6):769-83.

8. Richman JM, Liu SS, Courpas G, et al. Does continuous peripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids? A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(1):248-57.

9. Blaivas M, Adhikari S, Lander L. A prospective comparison of procedural sedation and ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block for shoulder reduction in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(9):922-7.

10. Korucu O, Dagar S, Çorbacioglu ŞK, et al. The effectiveness of greater occipital nerve blockade in treating acute migraine-related headaches in emergency departments. Acta Neurol Scand. 2018;138(3):212-8.

11. Tekin E, Ahiskalioglu A, Aydin ME, et al. High-thoracic ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for acute herpes zoster pain management in emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(2):375.e1-375.e3.

12. Mantuani D, Josh Luftig PA, Herring A, et al. Successful emergency pain control for acute pancreatitis with ultrasound guided erector spinae plane blocks. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(6):1298.e5-1298.e7.

13. Flores S, Herring AA. Ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block for ED paraphimosis reduction. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(6):863.e3-863.e863005.

14. Scopus Database. Available at: Accessed January 13, 2022.

15. Torpy JM, Lynm C, Golub RM. JAMA patient page. Regional anesthesia. JAMA. 2011;306(7):781.

16. Definition of emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 1981;10(7):385-8.

17. Sayers A. Tips and tricks in performing a systematic review: Chapter 4. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58(547):136.

18. Jeng CL, Rosenblatt MA. Overview of peripheral nerve blocks. 2022. Available at: Accessed August 14, 2022.

19. Wathen J, Neubrand T, Do H. Regional anesthesia in the pediatric emergency department. Clinic Pediatr Emerg Med. 2017;18(4):268-85.

20. Newman B, McCarthy L, Thomas PW, et al. A comparison of pre-operative nerve stimulator-guided femoral nerve block and fascia iliaca compartment block in patients with a femoral neck fracture. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(9):899-903.

21. Mangram AJ, Oguntodu OF, Hollingworth AK, et al. Geriatric trauma G-60 falls with hip fractures: a pilot study of acute pain management using femoral nerve fascia iliac blocks. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(6):1067-72.

22. Guarisco J, Salup A. Reducing opioid prescribing rates in emergency medicine. Ochsner J. 2018;18(1):42-5.

23. Duncan RW, Smith KL, Maguire M, et al. Alternatives to opioids for pain management in the emergency department decreases opioid usage and maintains patient satisfaction. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(1):38-44.

24. Berry FR. Analgesia in patients with fractured shaft of femur. Anaesthesia. 1977;32(6):576-7.

25. Lopez S, Gros T, Bernard N, et al. Fascia iliaca compartment block for femoral bone fractures in prehospital care. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28(3):203-7.

26. Fletcher AK, Rigby AS, Heyes FL. Three-in-one femoral nerve block as analgesia for fractured neck of femur in the emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(2):227-33.

27. Foss NB, Kristensen BB, Bundgaard M, et al. Fascia iliaca compartment blockade for acute pain control in hip fracture patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2007;106(4):773-8.

28. Lin DY, Morrison C, Brown B, et al. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides improved short-term analgesia compared with the femoral nerve block in hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized comparative trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(5):398-403.

29. Luftig J, Dreyfuss A, Mantuani D, et al. A new frontier in pelvic fracture pain control in the ED: successful use of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(12):2761.e5-2761.e9.

30. Blaivas M, Adhikari S, Lander L. A prospective comparison of procedural sedation and ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block for shoulder reduction in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(9):922-7.

31. Luftig J, Mantuani D, Herring AA, et al. Successful emergency pain control for posterior rib fractures with ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(8):1391-6.

32. Mittal R, Vermani E. Femoral nerve blocks in fractures of femur: variation in the current UK practice and a review of the literature. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(2):143-7.

33. Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, et al. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(3):408-17.

34. Munirama S, McLeod G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of ultrasound versus electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve location and blockade. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(9):1084-91.

35. Haskins SC, Fiasconaro M, Wilson L, et al. Ultrasound guidance for peripheral nerve blocks: an observational trend study of national data. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020.

36. Turbitt LR, Mariano ER, El-Boghdadly K. Future directions in regional anaesthesia: not just for the cognoscenti. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(3):293-7.

37. Riddell M, Ospina M, Holroyd-Leduc JM. Use of femoral nerve blocks to manage hip fracture pain among older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review. CJEM. 2016;18(4):245-52.

38. Newton-Brown E, Fitzgerald L, Mitra B. Audit improves emergency department triage, assessment, multi-modal analgesia and nerve block use in the management of pain in older people with neck of femur fracture. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2014;17(4):176-83.

39. Forouzan A, Masoumi K, Yadegar N, et al. Comparison of femoral nerve block with intravenous morphine sulfate for pain relief of femoral fracture. Asian J Sci Res. 2015;8:429-35.

40. Dochez E, van Geffen GJ, Bruhn J, et al. Prehospital administered fascia iliaca compartment block by emergency medical service nurses, a feasibility study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014;22:38.

41. McRae PJ, Bendall JC, Madigan V, et al. Paramedic-performed fascia iliaca compartment block for femoral fractures: a controlled trial. J Emerg Med. 2015;48(5):581-9.

42. Evans BA, Brown A, Fegan G, et al. Is fascia iliaca compartment block administered by paramedics for suspected hip fracture acceptable to patients? A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12):e033398.

43. Lippert SC, Nagdev A, Stone MB, et al. Pain control in disaster settings: a role for ultrasound-guided nerve blocks. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(6):690-6.

44. Liao SF, Chen PJ, Chaou CH, et al. Top-cited publications on point-of-care ultrasound: the evolution of research trends. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(8):1429-38.