Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

INTRODUCTION

One in four American adults suffers from a mental health condition at some point.^1,2 Despite a reported lower use of medical services overall,^1,3 these patients have been observed to be frequent users in the emergency department (ED).^4-7 Frequent ED visits could be a result of their uncontrolled health conditions.^8-12 Alternatively, when they consistently use the ED as their primary source of care, the avoidable ED revisits and hospital readmissions stress an already crowded healthcare system.^{10, 13-16}

Folsom et al. found that 15% of individuals with serious mental health conditions suffer from homelessness.¹⁷ The homeless population is vulnerable due to limited self-care ability, substance abuse and co-morbidities such as infections, skin diseases or HIV.^18-20 Similar to patients with mental health conditions, many use the ED as a regular source of care.^{5, 17, 21-23} Studies in the U.S. and Canada have shown that providing housing to homeless individuals may result in fewer hospital days and ED visits.^{18, 19, 24-27}

To address the medical needs of patients with mental health conditions, studies have focused on identifying factors that predict their ED revisits and hospital readmissions.^{11, 14} Young to middle age, male sex, Medicaid or uninsured and history of illicit drug use were among the major risk factors.^{4, 5, 8, 20, 21} However, the magnitude to which homelessness affects mental health patients’ health service utilization remains unclear in the medical community.^{11, 28} The objective of this study was to examine the impact of homelessness on ED revisits within 30 days post discharge and hospital readmissions among patients presenting with mental health conditions.

METHODS

We conducted secondary analysis of administrative data in the ED at an urban safety-net hospital covering all adult ED visits in 2012. Patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, type of insurance, level of acuity, and ED disposition were obtained. We defined homelessness as having the keyword “homeless” in the address line, or if the homeless item was checked in the patient registration form. Level of acuity (Emergency Severity Index – ESI) was a five-level triage algorithm assigned at patient’s arrival, from 1 (most urgent) to 5 (least urgent). All data were de-identified. The study was approved by the institutional review board.

The study divided the ED patient population into two groups, based on whether or not the patient had presented with a mental health condition during the study period. The investigators defined patients’ mental health status by converting the primary ICD-9 at visit-level into nine categories using the validated NYU ED Algorithm using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC).¹⁶ The NYU ED Algorithm helps classify ED utilization as being emergent, ED care needed, preventable, and whether the visits are mental health, alcohol, substance or injury related.¹⁶ Any patient having ≥1 visits reclassified under the “mental health principal diagnoses” category was considered as a patient ever presented with mental health conditions, regardless of the diagnoses of his/her other visits. We used this approach to minimize bias toward patient visits that were non-mental health-related that would potentially underestimate the mental health population in the patient sample.

Visit-level data and the number of visits per individual patient were recorded. The study had two outcome variables: 1) 30-day ED revisit, and 2) 30-day hospital readmission. We calculated both 30-day ED revisit and hospital readmission time based on the time difference between patients’ discharge date and the arrival date of their next visit. Any subsequent visit with a diagnosis of “aftercare” was considered a planned visit and was not captured as a revisit or readmission. The investigators extended tracking into the following year to ensure all 30-day ED revisits and hospital readmissions were captured for any ED visit taking place in December during the study period.

We used a multilevel modeling approach to account for patients with multiple visits in the dataset. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to test for moderation of homelessness on patients’ mental health status on the study outcomes. We computed adjusted predicted probabilities using regression coefficients to estimate the probability of a patient having 30-day ED revisits or hospital readmissions given his/her patient and visit characteristics. All statistical analyses used a two-sided test with α set to 0.05 and were analyzed with Stata 13.²⁹

RESULTS

The study included 139,414 adult ED visits in 2012, represented by 92,307 unique patients. Of the unique patients (43.5±15.1 years, 51.3% male, 68.2% Hispanic/Latino), 7.5% met the criteria of ever presented with mental health conditions during the study period (accounted for 11.7% of total visits), while 4.6% of patients were homeless at any time during the study period (accounted for 10.9% of total visits). Patients who presented with mental health conditions were more likely to be younger (38.3±13.6 vs. 43.9±15.1), male sex (61.1% vs. 50.5%), White (22.2% vs. 9.8%) or African-American (24.4% vs. 10.5%), and homeless (21.5% vs. 3.2%) compared to patients without mental health conditions (p<0.001). Patients who presented with mental health conditions had a higher number of total visits (2–5 visits: 35.9% vs. 21.0%, >5 visits: 6.6% vs. 1.4%), averaging 2.4±3.8 visits (range 1–184) versus 1.4±1.8 visits (range 1–98) among patients without mental health conditions (p<0.001) (Table 1 top).

In terms of visit-level data, patients who presented with mental health conditions were more likely to be covered by Medicare (9.6% vs. 4.8%, delta: 4.8%, 95% CI: [4.4, 5.2]) and other government programs (31.1% vs. 9.5%, delta: 21.6%, 95% CI: [21.1, 21.6]); to present to the ED with a lower level of acuity (ESI: 3.14 vs. 2.99, delta: 0.15, 95% CI: [0.14, 0.16]); to more frequently be transferred to outside facilities including psychiatric hospitals (33.7% vs. 4.6%, delta: 29.1%, 95% CI: [28.7, 29.6]); but less likely to be admitted to the hospital for non-psychiatric medical conditions (11.7% vs. 13.9%, delta: 2.2%, 95% CI: [1.7, 2.8]) compared to patients without mental health conditions (p<0.001). However, 42.5% of their subsequent ED visits were 30-day ED revisits, versus 17.2% by patients without mental health conditions (delta: 25.3%, 95% CI: [24.7, 26.0], p<0.001). In addition, 4.7% of their ED revisits resulted in hospital readmission, compared to 2.6% by patients without mental health conditions (delta: 2.1%, 95% CI: [1.8, 2.3], p<0.001).(Table 1 bottom).

Results from multilevel multivariate logistic regression (Table 2 top) showed a significant interaction between homelessness and mental health status. Overall, homeless patients presented with mental health conditions were more likely to have 30-day ED revisits (OR: 5.48, 95% CI: [4.85–6.18], p<0.001) and hospital readmissions (OR: 2.82, 95% CI: [2.31–3.46], p<0.001) compared to non-homeless, non-mental health (NHNM) patients. Among patients presenting with mental health conditions, being homeless contributed to an additional 28.0% increase in likelihood (4.28 to 5.48 odds) of 30-day ED revisits and 38.2% increase (2.04 to 2.82 odds) of hospital readmissions, while adjusting for other covariates. As for homeless patients, those presenting with mental health conditions contributed to an additional 181.0% increase in likelihood (1.95 to 5.48 odds) of 30-day ED revisits and a 64.0% increase (1.72 to 2.82 odds) of hospital readmissions.

Results from adjusted predicted probabilities showed that being homeless increased mental health patients’ probability of returning to the ED within 30 days from 25.2% to 31.1%. For hospital readmissions, the probability increased from 2.6% to 3.7%. Comparing to non-homeless non-mental health (NHNM), homeless patients presenting with mental health conditions demonstrated a four-fold increase (31.1% vs. 7.7%) in 30-day ED revisits, and 2.5-fold increase (3.7% vs. 1.5%) in hospital readmissions compared to NHNM patients (Table 2 bottom).

DISCUSSION

The findings that homeless patients and those presenting with mental health conditions have a significant increase in 30-day ED revisits and hospital readmissions compared to patients with neither of these problems is mostly consistent with prior literature on these patient groups. ^{14-7, 17, 21-23} What is novel in our study is finding that being homeless and having a mental health condition interact to produce even higher use, which likely contributes to an already crowded healthcare system.^{10, 13-16} These findings highlight the need for ED resources to treat patients in either of these categories.

Current literature on ED revisits and hospital readmissions is limited by the lack of advanced statistical modeling to account for within-patient level data.^{11, 14, 20} Using multilevel modeling helped control for the within-patient clustering effects so that patient characteristics of the repeated visitors would not be overrepresented in the estimations. In addition, testing for the interaction between homelessness and mental health conditions provided a quantitative measure and magnitude on either category to predict the study outcomes. As suggested in the literature,¹⁹ the two conditions interact in limiting an individual’s ability to care for self. This results in an increased likelihood of seeking more advanced-stage medical treatments.

The study has several limitations. Homelessness was a self-report measure; institutionalized individuals who provided an address of their shelter were eligible for inclusion without additional verification. This approach is a conservative definition of homelessness and if anything would tend to underestimate the odds of recidivism. The study also focused on a single-site, urban safety-net hospital, which might limit the generalizability. To define patients’ mental health status, the investigators only used patients’ primary diagnosis and might underestimate the prevalence of ED patients with mental health conditions. If this is the case, our estimates of the odds of recidivism for the mental health and homeless population will be biased downward (e.g. the actual odds ratios would be greater than we observed). However, the study results provided an estimate of the underserved, low-income patient population that was more likely to suffer from homelessness and mental health conditions. The data are practical given they reflect on a sample living in Los Angeles, a city where the rates of both conditions rank among the top in the nation, with high demand for medical needs but limited resources to address the problems.^{30, 31}

CONCLUSION

In summary, homelessness increased the likelihood of 30-day ED revisit and hospital readmission among patients who presented with mental health conditions. Interventions such as providing housing may improve their overall care management and have the potential to reduce their ED revisits and hospital readmissions over time.

Footnotes

Section Editor: Mark I. Langdorf, MD, MHPE

Full text available through open access at http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem

Address for Correspondence: Chun Nok Lam, MPH, University of Southern California, Department of Emergency Medicine, 1200 N State Street, Room 1011, Los Angeles, CA 90033. Email: chunnoklam@gmail.com. 9 / 2016; 17:607 – 612

Submission history: Revision received April 21, 2016; Submitted June 20, 2016; Accepted June 22, 2016

Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. The authors disclosed none.

REFERENCES

1. Mental Illness Surveillance Among Adults in the United States. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2011;60(3):1-32.

2. Estimating Mental Illness Among Adults in the United States: Revisions to the 2008 Estimation Procedures. 2015.

3. Mental Health Research Findings. 2009.

4. Liu SW, Nagurney JT, Chang Y, et al. Frequent ED users: are most visits for mental health, alcohol, and drug-related complaints?. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(10):1512-5.

5. Ku BS, Fields JM, Santana A, et al. The urban homeless: super-users of the emergency department. Popul Health Manag. 2014;17(6):366-71.

6. LaCalle E, Rabin E. Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(1):42-8.

7. Vandyk AD, Harrison MB, VanDenKerkhof EG, et al. Frequent emergency department use by individuals seeking mental healthcare: a systematic search and review. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2013;27(4):171-8.

8. Fuller RL, Atkinson G, McCullough EC, et al. Hospital readmission rates: the impacts of age, payer, and mental health diagnoses. J Ambul Care Manage. 2013;36(2):147-55.

9. LaCalle EJ, Rabin EJ, Genes NG. High-frequency users of emergency department care. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(6):1167-73.

10. Pines JM, Asplin BR, Kaji AH, et al. Frequent users of emergency department services: gaps in knowledge and a proposed research agenda. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(6):e64-9.

11. Smith MW, Stocks C, Santora PB. Hospital readmission rates and emergency department visits for mental health and substance abuse conditions. Community Ment Health J. 2015;51(2):190-7.

12. Uscher-Pines L, Pines J, Kellermann A, et al. Emergency department visits for nonurgent conditions: systematic literature review. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(1):47-59.

13. Castillo EM, Brennan JJ, Killeen JP, et al. Identifying frequent users of emergency department resources. J Emerg Med. 2014;47(3):343-7.

14. Donze J, Aujesky D, Williams D, et al. Potentially avoidable 30-day hospital readmissions in medical patients: derivation and validation of a prediction model. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(8):632-8.

15. Lindsey M, Patterson W, Ray K, et al. Potentially Preventable Hospital Readmissions among Medicaid Recipients with Mental Health and/or Substance Abuse Health Conditions Compared with All Others: New York State, 2007. Statistical Brief #3. 2007.

16. Billings J, Raven MC. Dispelling an urban legend: frequent emergency department users have substantial burden of disease. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(12):2099-108.

17. Folsom DP, Hawthorne W, Lindamer L, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for homelessness and utilization of mental health services among 10,340 patients with serious mental illness in a large public mental health system. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(2):370-6.

18. The State of Homelessness in America 2015. 2015.

19. National Coalition for the Homeless Mental Illness and Homelessness. 2009.

20. Thakarar K, Morgan JR, Gaeta JM, et al. Predictors of Frequent Emergency Room Visits among a Homeless Population. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0124552.

21. Chwastiak L, Tsai J, Rosenheck R. Impact of health insurance status and a diagnosis of serious mental illness on whether chronically homeless individuals engage in primary care. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(12):e83-9.

22. Forchuk C, Reiss JP, Mitchell B, et al. Homelessness and housing crises among individuals accessing services within a Canadian emergency department. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015.

23. Kushel MB, Vittinghoff E, Haas JS. Factors associated with the health care utilization of homeless persons. JAMA. 2001;285(2):200-6.

24. McCormack RP, Hoffman LF, Wall SP, Goldfrank LR. Resource-limited, collaborative pilot intervention for chronically homeless, alcohol-dependent frequent emergency department users. Am J Public Health. 2013;103( Suppl 2):S221-4.

25. Spicer B, Smith DI, Conroy E, et al. Mental illness and housing outcomes among a sample of homeless men in an Australian urban centre. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015;49(5):471-80.

26. Sadowski LS, Kee RA, VanderWeele TJ, et al. Effect of a housing and case management program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chronically ill homeless adults: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;301(17):1771-8.

27. Stergiopoulos V, Hwang SW, Gozdzik A, et al. Effect of scattered-site housing using rent supplements and intensive case management on housing stability among homeless adults with mental illness: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2015;313(9):905-15.

28. Downey VA, Zun LS. Reasons for readmissions: what are the reasons for 90-day readmissions of psychiatric patients from the ED?. Am J Emerg Med. 2015.

29. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. 2013.

30. L.A. spends $100 million a year on homelessness, city report finds [press release]. 2015.

31. Zenner J. In LA, Vets Become Homeless Faster Than The VA Can House Them. 2015.

Share on Facebook

Tweet

Share via email