|Lauren A. Walter, MD||University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Emergency Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama|
|Elizabeth Leader, MD||University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Emergency Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama|
|James W. Galbraith, MD||University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jackson, Mississippi|
A vaccine targeting high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) strains can effectively prevent HPV-associated cervical cancer risk. However, many girls and women do not receive the vaccine, more often those impacted by health disparities associated with race and/or socioeconomic status. This same disparate population has also been shown to be at higher risk for cervical cancer. Many of these women also rely on the emergency department (ED) as a safety net for their healthcare. This study sought to gather information pertaining to HPV and cervical cancer risk factors, awareness of HPV and the vaccine, as well as HPV vaccine uptake in female patients presenting to an ED.
We obtained 81 surveys completed by female ED patients. Demographics included age, race, income, insurance status, primary care provider status, and known cervical-cancer risk factors. Subsequent survey questions explored respondents’ knowledge, familiarity, and attitudes regarding HPV, cervical cancer, and the HPV vaccine, including vaccination uptake rates. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test.
Approximately one in seven respondents (14.8%) had never previously heard of HPV and 32.1% were unaware of the existence of a HPV vaccine. Minority patients, including those who were Black and Hispanic patients, low income patients, and uninsured and publicly insured patients were less likely to be aware of HPV and the vaccine and likewise were less likely to be offered and receive the vaccine. More than 60% of all respondents (61.3%) had never previously been offered the vaccine, and only 24.7% of all respondents had completed the vaccine series.
Female ED patients may represent an at-risk cohort with relatively low HPV awareness and low HPV vaccine uptake. The ED could represent a novel opportunity to access and engage high-risk HPV populations.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection and the most common cause of cervical cancer and cervical cancer-related deaths in the United States (US).1-4 HPV infection and HPV-associated cervical cancer are preventable due to the advent of highly effective vaccines available since 2006. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as well as the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, recommend the HPV vaccination series for girls aged 11 or 12 years of age, as well as females aged 13 to 26 not adequately vaccinated previously.1,5 In response to these recommendations, HPV awareness and vaccination rates have increased, but overall vaccination uptake remains well below national goals.6
Most alarming, significant disparities in HPV vaccine knowledge and vaccine series completion exist among those with the highest rates of HPV infection, including racial minorities, the under- and uninsured, and the economically disadvantaged.7-11 Further, cervical cancer incidence and mortality are higher among Black and Hispanic women as compared to White women, and cervical cancer incidence has been shown to be nearly twice as high among those living in poverty.12 For these reasons, it is a national priority to raise HPV awareness and vaccination among these disproportionately affected populations.
Due to challenges accessing primary care, disparate populations may benefit from engagement in HPV awareness and screening in alternative venues.13 Emergency departments (ED) have previously been demonstrated to be high-yield and effective venues for raising awareness of similar silent, stigmatizing, and deadly conditions–specifically, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV).14,15 Thus, it has been suggested that the ED be considered as an alternative setting for HPV education, screening, and vaccine administration in an effort to overcome barriers to HPV provision in all populations.16
We sought to measure and characterize HPV and cervical cancer awareness, risk factors, and HPV vaccination history among adult females presenting to an urban, academic ED. We hypothesized that female patients in the ED would demonstrate lower rates of HPV awareness and vaccination uptake than the general population.
We performed a cross-sectional, survey-based study at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), an urban, academic ED in the Southeast US with an affiliated emergency medicine residency program and an annual volume of approximately 65,000, from June 1–August 31, 2016. The UAB Institutional Review Board approved the protocol. Adult female patients, aged 18–32, were recruited to participate in the survey during their ED visit. We selected the age of 32 as the upper age limit for survey engagement to align with the availability of the HPV vaccine and vaccine administration guidelines beginning in 2006.17 Trained female research assistants (RA) recruited applicable patients and administered the survey Monday through Friday, 9 am to 4 pm (a convenience sample).
We collected 81 completed surveys in this pilot study to demonstrate feasibility. Exclusion criteria included the following: individuals who did not speak English or for whom communication barriers were present (eg, altered mental status, dementia); were medically or psychiatrically unstable; or who were undergoing active emergent evaluation or treatment; and individuals presenting for sexual assault. Subjects were recruited and administered the surveys in private rooms, and written informed consent was provided. RAs verbally delivered the survey questions in a casual interview style.
The 21-item survey instrument was developed by the study authors with the intent to be expansive, capturing general HPV awareness as well as HPV vaccine uptake information, in addition to demographic factors to include pre-existing cervical-cancer risk factors. While created de novo, the survey was influenced by previously published HPV awareness and attitude survey studies.12,16,18,19 The final survey (Appendix A) contained the following: demographic information; HPV infection and vaccine awareness; HPV vaccination history; HPV infection and cervical cancer risk factors. Survey questions met a SMOG (Simple Measure of Gobbledygook) reading index of 7th grade and a Gunning Fog score of 8.6, designating it “fairly easy to read.”20,21 The RA was allowed to clarify for the respondent any real-time questions regarding definitions and/or survey question verbiage as needed.
Population Health Research Capsule
What do we already know about this issue?
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the US, responsible for over 90% of cervical cancer cases. HPV vaccine uptake is low.
What was the research question?
Evaluate and characterize HPV awareness and vaccine rates in female patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).
What was the major finding of the study?
The female ED population represents a unique, at-risk cohort in regard to HPV and cervical-cancer risk factors.
How does this improve population health?
This study challenges emergency physicians to consider an expanded role as HPV educator and vaccine advocate, particularly for “at-risk” patients.
We selected a $20,000 annual household income threshold to reflect the 2016 Federal Poverty Line (FPL), the minimum amount of gross income that a family needs for food, clothing, transportation, shelter, and other necessities, as determined by the Department of Health and Human Services.23 In 2016, the FPL for a two-person household was $16,020 and for a three-person household was $20,160. To effectively capture the majority of respondents and understand the effect of socioeconomic status, we selected a delineation of $20,000 for the purpose of this study.
We collected the project data in a secure REDCap database.22 We determined the proportion of participants acknowledging HPV awareness and prior vaccination stratified by age, gender, race, access to primary care, income, and medical insurance status, assessing non-random differences of association using Fisher’s exact test (STATA/IC, 15.1, College Station, Texas).
A total of 81 surveys were completed. Participant demographics are displayed in Table 1. Insurance status information was unavailable for one respondent (0.05%); likewise, income information was unavailable for five respondents (6.2%), and primary care provider status was unavailable for one respondent (1.2%). Three respondents (3.7%) identified more than one locale where they routinely sought primary care services.
|Race||n = 81|
|Black or African American||50 (61.7%)|
|White or Caucasian||28 (34.6%)|
|Hispanic or Latina||3 (3.7%)|
|Insurance Status||n = 80|
|Publicly insured or uninsured||44 (55.0%)|
|Income||n = 76|
|Primary Care Provider Status||n = 80|
|Established primary care||42 (52.5%)|
|Federally funded or “free” clinic||20 (25.0%)|
|Emergency department or urgent care||17 (21.25%)|
Selected survey question responses with demographic delineation are displayed in Table 2. Survey response data regarding HPV vaccination rates was available for 80 survey respondents. One respondent who had previously received the HPV vaccine and four who had not received the vaccine did not disclose or were unaware of their annual household income.
|Yes n (%)||No n (%)||p-value|
|Have you heard of HPV?||69 (85.2)||12 (14.8)|
|Black or African American||41 (82.0)||9 (18.0)|
|White or Caucasian||27 (96.4)||1 (3.6)|
|Hispanic or Latina||1 (33.3%)||2 (66.7%)||.016|
|Private insurance||34 (94.4)||2 (5.6)|
|Publicly Insured or Uninsured||35 (77.8)||10 (22.2)||.057|
|<$20,000/year||34 (77.3)||10 (22.7)|
|>$20,000/year||31 (96.9)||1 (3.1)||.020|
|Primary Care Provider Status|
|Established PCP||37 (94.9)||2 (5.1)|
|Federally funded or “free” clinic||14 (73.7)||5 (26.3)|
|ED or Urgent Care||12 (80.0)||3 (20.0)|
|None or “Other”||4 (80.0)||1 (20.0)||0.072|
|Respondents who have received partial or complete HPV vaccinations||23 (28.75)||57 (71.25)|
|Race||23 (28.75)||57 (71.25)|
|Black or African American||13 (26.0)||37 (74.0)|
|White or Causcasian||10 (37.0)||17 (63.0)|
|Hispanic or Latina||0 (0)||3 (100)||.437|
|Private insurance||13 (36.1)||23 (63.9)|
|Publicly insured or uninsured||10 (22.7)||34 (77.3)||.221|
|<$20,000/year||9 (20.9)||34 (79.1)|
|>$20,000/year||13 (40.6)||19 (59.3)||.077|
|Primary Care Provider Status|
|Established PCP||15 (35.7)||27 (64.3)|
|Federally funded or “free” clinic||2 (10.0)||18 (90.0)|
|ED or Urgent care||5 (29.4)||12 (70.6)|
|None or “Other”||1 (14.3)||6 (85.7)||.150|
*HPV, human papillomavirus; PCP, primary care provider; ED, emergency department.
HPV awareness was significantly higher among White respondents (96.4%, p = .016) and those with higher annual income (96.9%, p = .020). Among respondents with awareness of HPV, however, additional understanding of its designation as a common sexually transmitted infection and its association with cervical cancer was generally mixed. White patients were more likely to be aware of the HPV-cervical cancer association (). HPV vaccine awareness was higher among patients with an established primary care provider (84.6%, p = .003) and lower among those publicly insured or uninsured (42.2%, p = .034) and those with lower annual household income (40.9%, p = .048).
Only 38.8% respondents reported ever being offered the HPV vaccine and 24.7% previously completed the vaccination series. Of those vaccinated for HPV, 78% reported receiving the vaccine at their primary care physician’s office. Notably, 12.5% of respondents reported declining a prior HPV vaccination.
Of those age-eligible (n = 43) for HPV vaccination, 76% reported they would be comfortable initiating and receiving HPV vaccination in the ED.
A number of known cervical-cancer risk factors were also identified among respondents: inconsistent use of barrier contraceptive during sexual activity (59.5%); tobacco use (27.2%); pregnancy prior to age 17 (12.3%); and a family history of cervical cancer (7.6%) (Appendix C).
In general, our survey respondents demonstrated a population with low HPV awareness and low HPV vaccination rates along with significant risk factors for HPV exposure and cervical cancer. The HPV vaccine series completion rate reported in this unique ED population was far below national vaccination rates. In 2017, 49% of US teens had completed the HPV vaccine series as compared to less than a quarter of our survey respondents.24 Racial and social inequities that have previously been associated with decreased vaccination rates in the primary care setting were echoed and, in some cases, amplified in this ED venue.7-11
In addition, it is alarming to note the number of vaccine-eligible women who reported they had never been counselled about nor offered the HPV vaccine, potentially because they did not have a primary care physician or the resources to see one regularly. Equally concerning was the nearly 13% refusal rate by those who had been offered the vaccine. Reasons given for declination were variable but predominantly included “I feel the illness is not severe or ‘bad enough’ to warrant vaccination,” and “The preservatives in the vaccines are dangerous.” This may represent lack of an established or primary care relationship to offer sufficient education regarding HPV, HPV’s direct association with cervical cancer, and vaccines in general.25
The study population also demonstrated a low awareness of HPV’s direct correlation with cervical cancer along with a significant risk profile for cervical cancer. Thirty-five percent were unaware of the HPV-cervical cancer connection, with even higher percentages noted among Black patients (44.9%) and the uninsured (57.1%). This has been demonstrated previously and may represent the influence of socioeconomic determinants of health, which can affect primary care access and utilization of preventive health services.11,12,19 Likewise, prevalence of several cervical-cancer risk factors among respondents was noted to be high as compared to the general population including smoking tobacco (27.2% among respondents compared to 15.5% nationwide) and full-term pregnancy before age 17 (12.3% of respondents compared to 19 births per 1000 in the US in 2017, or nearly seven times the national rate).26,27 The over-representation of cervical-cancer risk factors in this population underscores a vulnerable, at-risk subset.
The survey results highlight several potential engagement opportunites for emergency physicians (EP) to consider, including HPV awareness campaigns and ED-initiated HPV vaccine administration. Physician recommendation has been shown to be the most effective indicator of HPV uptake among vaccine-eligible women and may be equally effective in an ED setting.28-31 However, as Hill and Okugo demonstrated when assessing EP attitudes toward proposed HPV vaccine initiation in the ED, perceived barriers to HPV education and vaccine initiation in the ED setting do exist, including concerns regarding time requirements and reimbursement.32 Likewise, it is anticipated that some EPs may not embrace a preventative medicine role, a wheelhouse that traditionally has belonged to primary care physicians.
EPs, however, as demonstrated by our survey responses, may represent the only healthcare encounters many women ever have. EDs, as part of the national public health safety net, frequently encounter subsets of the general population who often have minimal interaction with or limited access to the traditional primary care-based healthcare system.13,33 Considering an expanded role for the EP, incorporating social determinants of health and their influence on our patients, beyond immediate stabilization and acuity, will be paramount to our patients’ health as well as general public health.
Initiating a conversation with EPs and primary care partners and/or community resources may be an important consideration as the healthcare system attempts to address HPV from a public health perspective.34 Certainly it is interesting to note that the majority of survey respondents were amenable to HPV vaccine initiation in the ED.
The ED setting has more recently been used as a venue for universal screening of other sexually transmitted viral infections, including HIV and HCV. Well established, opt-out screening programs of this type have resulted in the successful linkage of care of previously undiagnosed and untreated HIV- and/or HCV-positive patients, many of whom may have had no other access to testing or definitive care.14,15 Initiating a similar ED-based HPV vaccine awareness and initiation with a linkage to care program may be a way to bridge the existing HPV gaps in the US, particularly among racial and socioeconomic groups suffering from healthcare disparities.
Future, more expansive studies, considering additional evaluation of the adolescent age range as well as male patients, would be useful to further characterize the at-risk population presenting routinely to the ED setting.
This is a single-center study, and as such, results may not be universally applicable to all ED settings. In addition, the results represent a convenience sample collected as a pilot study and may not reflect overall ED demographics. In certain instances (eg, Hispanic respondents), small response numbers may limit data interpretation. Likewise, demographic data on excluded patients, as well as those who refused participation, was not collected in this feasibility study, which may also limit its general applicability. Exclusion of population subsets, particularly non-English speaking individuals, may result in skewed data; however, the majority of non-English speaking patients presenting to our ED represent underserved minorities who face similar healthcare inequities to other minority groups, including decreased rates of HPV vaccination. Thus, we suspect that inclusion of their responses and data would likely contribute to disparities noted in the discussion above. Because survey answers were self-reported by respondents, there was a potential for recall bias and/or social desirability bias, which could have contributed to over- or under-inflation of personal medical history and/or risk factor reporting in particular. Finally, pediatric patients, an important patient subset, were excluded from our study. A nearby children’s hospital caters to the majority of local pediatric emergency patients, limiting pediatric patient exposure in the study ED.
HPV awareness and vaccination rates in this female ED population were low while cervical-cancer risk factor rates were high, identifying a particularly vulnerable population. EDs may be a high-yield venue for HPV and cervical cancer prevention including education, screening, and vaccine initiation.
Section Editor: Elissa Perkins, MD
Full text available through open access at http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem
Address for Correspondence: Lauren A. Walter, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Emergency Medicine, 619 19th St. S, OHB 251, Birmingham, AL. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org. 3 / 2020; 21:203 – 208
Submission history: Revision received July 11, 2019; Submitted November 30, 2019; Accepted December 5, 2019
Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.
1. STD Facts – Human papillomavirus (HPV). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/stdfact-hpv.htm. Accessed June 2, 2019.
2. Bouvard B, Baan R, Straif K, et al. A review of human carcinogens. Part B: biological agents. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:321-32.
3. Schiffman M, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, et al. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007;370:890-7.
4. Cancer of the Cervix Uteri – Cancer Stat Facts. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html. Accessed June 2, 2019.
5. FDA licensure of bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV2, Cervarix) for use in females and updated HPV recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(20):626-30.
6. Vanderpool RC, Stradtman LR. Protecting a new generation against HPV: Are we willing to be bold?. Hum Vacc & Immunother. 2014;10(9):2559-61.
7. Niccolai LM, Mehta NR, Hadler JL, et al. Racial/ethnic and poverty disparities in human papillomavirus vaccination completion. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(4):428-33.
8. Gelman A, Nikolajski C, Schwarz EB, et al. Racial disparities in awareness of the human papillomavirus. J Womens Health. 2011;20(8):1165-73.
9. Jeudin P, Liveright E, del Carmen MG, et al. Race, ethnicity and income as factors for HPV vaccine acceptance and use. Hum Vacc & Immunotherap. 2013;9(7):1413-20.
10. Owusu-Edusel K, Chesson HW, et al. The association between racial disparity in income and reported sexually transmitted infections. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(5):910-7.
11. Ford JL. Racial and ethnic disparities in human papillomavirus awareness and vaccination among young adult women. Public Health Nurs. 2011;28(6):485-93.
12. Ramondetta LM, Meyer LA, Schmeler KM, et al. Avoidable tragedies: disparities in healthcare access among medically underserved women diagnosed with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;139(3):500-5.
13. Begley CE, Vojvodic RW, Seo M, et al. Emergency room use and access to primary care: evidence from Houston, Texas. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006;17(3):610-24.
14. Galbraith JW, Willig JH, Rodgers JB, et al. Evolution and escalation of an emergency department routine, opt-out HIV screening and linkage-to-care program. Public Health Rep. 2016;131(Suppl 1):96-106.
15. Anderson ES, Galbraith JW, Deering LJ, et al. Continuum of Care for hepatitis c virus among patients diagnosed in the emergency department setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(11):1540-6.
16. Millen JC, Ginde AA, Anderson AT, et al. Multicenter study of knowledge about human papilloma virus and attitudes among emergency department patients. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009;22(6):356-9.
17. Huh WK, Ault KA, Chelmow D, et al. Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: Interim clinical guidance. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136(2):178-82.
18. Guerra R, Bhalwal A, Ibarra C, et al. Awareness of HPV vaccinations and barriers to vaccination amongst underserved women. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;147(1):233.
19. Walsh CD, Gera A, Shah M, et al. Public knowledge and attitudes towards human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:368.
20. Wang LW, Miller MJ, Schmitt MR, et al. Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations. Res Social Adm Phar. 2013;9(5):503-16.
21. Hollabaugh M. Clearing the fog. J Coll Sci Teach. 1989;18(5):327-9.
22. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-81.
23. Federal Poverty Level (FPL) Guidelines. 2016. Available at: https://www.peoplekeep.com/blog/2016-federal-poverty-level-fpl-guidelines. Accessed October 1, 2019.
24. Walker TY, Elams-Evans LD, Yankey D, et al. National, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years – United States, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(33):909-17.
25. Smith PJ, Kennedy AM, Wooten K, et al. Association between health care providers’ influence on parents who have concerns about vaccine safety and vaccination coverate. Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):e1287-92.
26. Smoking is down, but almost 38 million American adults still smoke. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2018/p0118-smoking-rates-declining.html. Accessed October 1, 2019.
27. Teen Births. Available at: https://www.childtrends.org/indicators/teen-births. Accessed October 1, 2019.
28. Walling EB, Benzoni N, Dornfield J, et al. Interventions to improve HPV vaccine uptake: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2016;138(1):1566-88.
29. Cook RL, Zhang J, Mullins J, et al. Factors associated with initiation and completion of human papillomavirus vaccine series among young women enrolled in Medicaid. J Adolesc Health. 2010;47(6):596-9.
30. Kester LM, Zimet GD, Fortenberry JD, et al. A national study of HPV vaccination of adolescent girls: rates, predictors, and reasons for non-vaccination. J Matern Child Health. 2013;17(5):879-85.
31. Vadaparampil ST, Kahn JA, Salmon D, et al. Missed clinical opportunities: provider recommendations for HPV vaccination for 11–12-year-old girls are limited. Vaccine. 2011;29(47):8634-41.
32. Hill M, Okugo G. Emergency medicine physician attitude toward HPV vaccine uptake in an emergency department setting. Hum Vacc & Immunotherap. 2014;10(9):2551-6.
33. Glauser J. Rationing and the role of the emergency department as society’s safety net. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(11):1101-6.
34. Taylor TB. Threats to the health care safety net. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1080-7.
35. Olshen E, Woods ER, Austin SB, et al. Parental acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37(3):248-51.
36. Boehner CW, Howe SR, Bernstein DI, et al. Virally sexually transmitted disease vaccine acceptability among college students. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2003;30(10):774-8.
37. Zimet GD, Mays RM, Winston Y, et al. Acceptability of human papillomavirus immunization. J Women’s Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9(1):47-50.
38. Gordon JA, Chudnofsky CR, Hayward RA. Where health and welfare meet: social deprivation among patients in the emergency department. J Urban Health. 2001;78(1):104-11.
39. Widdice LE, Bernstein DI, Leonard AC, et al. Adherence to the HPV vaccine dosing intervals and factors associated with completion of 3 doses. Pediatrics. 2011;127(1):77-84.
40. Hariri S, Unger ER, Sternberg M, et al. Prevalence of genital human papillomavirus among females in the United States, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(4):566-73.
41. Hunt KA, Weber EJ, Showstack JS, et al. Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(1):1-8.