Author | Affiliation |
---|---|
Jesse Zane Kellar, MD, MBA | Saint Agnes Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fresno, California |
Hanna Barrett, DO, MPH | Saint Agnes Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fresno, California |
Jaclyn Floyd, MD | Eisenhower Health, Emergency Medicine Residency, Rancho Mirage, California |
Michelle Kim, MD | Riverside Community Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Riverside, California |
Matthias Barden, MD | Eisenhower Health, Emergency Medicine Residency, Rancho Mirage, California |
Jason An, MD | Riverside Community Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Riverside, California |
Ashley Garispe, DO | Saint Agnes Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fresno, California |
Matthew Hysell, MD | Emergency Medicine Residency Corewell Health South, Graduate Medical Education Department, St. Joseph, Michigan |
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Limitations
Conclusion
ABSTRACT
Introduction
In this study we aimed to investigate the effects of incorporating Swedish-style fika (coffee) breaks into the didactic schedule of emergency medicine residents on their sleepiness levels during didactic sessions. Fika is a Swedish tradition that involves a deliberate decision to take a break during the workday and usually involves pastries and coffee. We used the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale to assess changes in sleepiness levels before and after the implementation of fika breaks.
Methods
The study design involved a randomized crossover trial approach, with data collected from emergency medicine residents over a specific period. This approach was done to minimize confounding and to be statistically efficient.
Results
Results revealed the average sleepiness scale was 4.6 and 5.5 on fika and control days, respectively (P = 0.004).
Conclusion
Integration of fika breaks positively influenced sleepiness levels, thus potentially enhancing the educational experience during residency didactics.
INTRODUCTION
Emergency medicine (EM) residency is known for its demanding schedules and high-stress environment. The intensity of residency training can lead to stress, fatigue, and reduced well-being.1 At the same time, didactics play a crucial role in providing residents with the necessary knowledge and skills to deliver high-quality patient care and are a key component of learning advancement. Weekly conference sessions may vary in length from program to program but typically comprise five hours of protected time devoted to learning fundamental EM content every week. Much work has been done in recent years to improve the quality of these conferences, such as implementing shorter lectures, interactive sessions, team-based learning, and flipped classrooms.2 However, little work has focused on mitigating resident fatigue and decreased attention at the end of the conference session. Research in adult learning data reveals that the attention span of the adult learner decreases dramatically after 15–20 minutes.3 Consequently, it is not difficult to assume that after three or four hours of conference, the attention span of the average adult learner has been spent. One possible way to address these challenges is to incorporate breaks in conference days inspired by the Swedish custom of att ta en fika, or simply fika (coffee), into conference days.
Introducing fika breaks can provide residents with much-needed opportunities for relaxation and self-care. The Swedes are known for having a highly beneficial work and life balance compared to people in other countries.4 One proposed explanation is the culture of conscientiously taking regularly scheduled breaks, known as fika, during the workday to relax and regroup.5 That logic could be extrapolated into resident education. If residents could participate in fika and engage in pleasant conversations with time away from the intense learning environment, it could help alleviate stress, boost morale, and improve mental well-being.
In this study we explored the potential advantages of taking 15-minute fika breaks in conjunction with monitoring sleepiness levels using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS). For the purposes of this study, four EM residency programs implemented fika breaks during resident conferences to assess whether taking a 15-minute fika break after the second hour of didactics impacted resident alertness. Our goal was to explore the concept of fika and how it may improve EM residents’ alertness during weekly conference.
METHODS
Study Design and Setting
We conducted a multicenter, randomized crossover trial from August 25, 2022–January 5, 2023 to determine the association between resident fatigue during conferences with and without a fika break among EM residents. Four EM residencies participated in this study, which was reviewed and approved by each hospital’s respective institutional review board. Table 1 outlines defining characteristics of the four sites.
Site number | Number of EM residents | Length of conference in hours | Scheduled breaks | Interactive sessions (small groups, flipped classes) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 18 | 5 | Yes | Yes |
2 | 29 | 5 | Yes | Yes |
3 | 39 | 4–5 | No* | Yes |
4 | 24 | 4 | Occasionally | Yes |
*Food was available during conference.
EM, emergency medicine.
For fatigue assessment we used the KSS, a validated self-assessment tool used to measure an individual’s level of sleepiness or alertness at a given moment.6 Decreased levels of alertness using the KSS score have been associated with deceased performance and cognitive function.7,8 Developed by researchers at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, the scale consists of a series of levels, typically ranging from 1–9, where each level corresponds to a different degree of sleepiness.6 Participants are asked to rate their current level of sleepiness based on the descriptions provided for each level. Lower numbers on the scale indicate higher levels of alertness (1 = extremely alert), while higher numbers indicate increasing levels of sleepiness (9 = very sleepy, great effort keeping awake, fighting sleep).5 The KSS is often used in sleep research, clinical settings, and studies related to fatigue and sleep disorders to gain insights into people’s subjective perception of their own alertness or drowsiness.6
Instructions were provided during intervention (fika) and control dates, asking the EM residents to circle the number that represented their perceived level of sleepiness at that point in time. An additional unrelated wellness question was included in the questionnaire to keep this study blind. During the first phase of the study, the four sites were split randomly into two groups. The two groups were then randomly assigned two control dates and two intervention dates. One group started with control dates, followed by intervention dates. The second group started with intervention dates, followed by control dates. This was done to help offset possible fatigue differences due to the passage of time. Table 2 demonstrates the control and intervention dates of each site.
Site number | Date of control | Date of intervention (Fika) |
---|---|---|
1 | September 28, October 5 | September 14, October 12 |
2 | September 21, October 5 | September 1, December 15 |
3 | August 25, January 5 | September 1, December 15 |
4 | October 13, December 8 | October 20, November 3 |
During the intervention days, a 15-minute Swedish-style fika break was added into the EM conference schedule after the second hour of conference. The fika breaks were to be held in a location outside the lecture area where EM residents were provided with coffee, non-caffeinated beverages, pastries, and snacks. Residents were instructed that there should not be any work-related discussion, as this break serves to encourage socialization and relaxing conversation. On control days, normal breaks occurred as scheduled during EM conference. During both phases, the survey was conducted before the last hour of conference.
Selection of Participants
Study participants were EM residents across the four participating hospitals. There were 25 postgraduate (PGY) year-1 residents, 18 PGY-2 residents, 16 PGY-3 residents, and 4 PGY-4 residents for a total of 98 residents. A total of 64 residents participated in at least one survey during both the control and fika sessions to allow paired comparison.
Interventions
The intervention in this study consisted of implementing a 15-minute fika break after the second hour of lecture where coffee, non-caffeinated beverages, pastries, and snacks were made available. This was conducted twice over several months. On control days, participating sites had instructions to not change any regular scheduled curriculum breaks or limit the food and drink that were normally present. Normal breaks at participating sites ranged from 10–15 minutes, and all programs had food and caffeinated drinks available on control days.
Data Analysis
We compiled the numerical data obtained from the KSS surveys taken by the EM residents from the control and fika sessions for analysis and separated it into two subgroups, consisting of a residency site subgroup and a PGY subgroup. The residency site subgroup was broken down into each respective participating residency program, and the PGY subgroup was broken down into each PGY class (1–4). We used a paired sample t-test to compare the mean KSS of the resident cohort both before and after implementation of fika. This was done for individual EM residency programs and for all EM residency programs participating as a larger cohort.
RESULTS
Sleepiness on Fika vs Control Days
Figure 1 presents the mean results of the sleepiness measured on days where fika was implemented vs control. The average sleepiness was 4.6 on fika days and 5.5 on control days with standard deviation of 2.2 and 2.1, respectively, P-value = 0.004. This indicates that residents were more awake on days when fika was implemented, and this result was statistically significant. Figure 2 demonstrates the results of the KSS separated by participating residency programs. Site 3 had the biggest improvement in sleepiness (3.3 on fika days vs 6.2 on control days). Site 2 had the least improvement in alertness and actually showed that fika intervention increased sleepiness in residents (5.0 on fika days vs 4.8 on control days), although the difference was not statistically significant.
Figure 3 depicts the alertness by residency year from all participating residency programs. We found that improvement in alertness was more visible in first- and second-year residents compared to third- and fourth-year residents. Due to low sample size, however, this difference was likely by chance and not statistically significant.
DISCUSSION
The findings suggest that the inclusion of fika breaks into the EM residency didactics positively influenced participants’ sleepiness levels. The reduced sleepiness during conference sessions could potentially enhance residents’ attention, engagement, and knowledge retention, leading to improved educational outcomes.
Improved Learning Outcomes
While the primary goal of residency conferences is to impart medical knowledge and skills, the effectiveness of learning can be enhanced by incorporating fika breaks and monitoring sleepiness levels with KSS. Studies have shown that brief breaks during learning sessions can improve attention and retention of information. By stepping away from conference lecture sessions and using the KSS, we were able to assess residents’ levels of sleepiness and determine the effectiveness of the breaks in reinvigorating their focus. These findings can be used to optimize the timing and duration of fika breaks, ensuring that they contribute to improved learning outcomes and better knowledge retention.
Fostered Social Interactions
Building a strong sense of community and fostering social interactions is vital for resident overall well-being.9 Fika breaks provide an ideal platform for residents to connect on a more personal level, share experiences, and develop supportive relationships with their peers and faculty members. These informal interactions encourage open communication, collaboration, and mentorship opportunities. By also considering the sleepiness levels with KSS during these breaks, organizers can tailor the frequency and structure of fika sessions to promote optimal social interactions while mitigating the risk of residents becoming excessively fatigued or drowsy.
LIMITATIONS
The study has several limitations, including a relatively small sample size and a short intervention period. Future research could involve larger studies with extended intervention periods to further explore the long-term effects of fika breaks on EM residency conference days. During control days, residents could have consumed coffee or soda that contained caffeine. Lasty, the effect of different type of breaks could also be considered, such as a walk or other intentional break, to determine whether that activity has the same effect. All participating sites on control days had slight variations in the nature and length of breaks.
CONCLUSION
Incorporating Swedish-style fika breaks into emergency medicine residency conferences improved the overall alertness in EM residents. Residency programs should consider this unique approach to prioritize resident wellness and optimize educational experiences. Further research can explore the long-term effects of fika breaks and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale monitoring on resident burnout, performance, and career satisfaction in EM residency programs.
Footnotes
Section Editor: Muhammad Waseem, MD
Full text available through open access at http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem
Address for Correspondence: Jesse Zane Kellar, MD, MBA, Department of Emergency Medicine, Saint Agnes Medical Center, 1303 East Herndon Avenue, Fresno, CA 93720-3309. Email: jesse.kellar@vituity.com
07 / 2024; 25:574 – 578
Submission history: Revision received September 12, 2023; Submitted March 6, 2024; Accepted March 18, 2024
Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.